Posts

The Revolution Ends: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 154-174

When we ended last week, Webster was trying to explain that the Revolution of 1848 failed because it didn’t instantly fix the problem of unemployment. Instead, what it did, was set up a council which then created employment camps that helped people find jobs. This was bad for the reason that the state should not do this. Why? Well, let’s see if she can explain it this week. We get a quote from a character named “Mermeix,” aka Gabriel Terrail; a mediocre journalist and person who accepted bribes in order to change the story. The quote is, “ a government cannot guarantee work since does not depend on it to provide customers.” This is a pseudo profound bullshit. It sounds good at first glance, but any inquiry into this idea shows how vapid it is. The entire thing is based on a false premise; not all work is based on the idea of a transactional relationship. You don’t need customers for work. No one built a road for “customers,” educated children for “customers,” or led the police for “cus...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New French Revolution II: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 149-154

One of the goals of this project is to take away the “punch” of conspiracy theory books. They generally look impressive and are full of information that the author has tied together into a grand conspiracy. For the most part these books do a good job in convincing because people tend to skip over the parts they don’t care about. An actual historian would be more interested in the narrative that Webster is pushing now, but the audience that is going to scoop up this book is skipping it. This is my seventh book for this blog and I can say this: she needs to remind the reader what the point is once in a while. On the plus side, she hasn’t mentioned “the Jews” in about thirty pages. We are at the beginning of the Bourgeousie revolution and so far, Webster really has nothing to go on. So far she’s told us that the protestors/revolutionaries had legitimate complaints, those in power were offering some concessions, and negotiations were happening. The problem, that we know from history, is th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New French Revolution: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 143-149

I’m trying to figure out who the villain is in our story. Of course it’s the Illuminati, but it’s also the Socialists. It’s anyone that that challenges the status quo. So what’s interesting about the Revolution of 1830 is that this was a revolution against the new status quo put in place by the Illuminati after the only free period of Europe: that which took place during the reign of Napolean. So the Bourgeoise monarchy comes into power and like all monarchies it becomes one that ignores the plight of the people and serves only itself. Which, ok, that’s just how monarchies go—it’s how the one prior to 1789 went that Webster claimed was “for” the people. So then in 1848, the next revolution begins but Webster is claiming, again, that this was organized “ by the Secret Societies, directed by the Socialists, executed by the working-men and aggravated by the intractable attitude of the King and his ministers, the second great outbreak of World Revolution took place. ” She admits that there...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fools Russian: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 140-143

 The Russian revolution figures heavily into conspiracy lore because it also settles into the fear of conservatives over Communism. The John Birch Society likely never exists if the omnipresent boogeymen of Communism doesn’t scare their members into donating. We’re obviously before that time, WWII hasn’t happened yet, and Webster is writing pretty recently after the formation of the USSR under Josef Stalin. The problem that conspiracy theorists have in covering the Russian Revolution is the same problem that they have in covering the French Revolution: they have to pretend that everything was fine before the revolution. What’s going to be interesting about this chapter is that Webster is stepping outside of her comfort zone. She’s written a historical book about the French Revolution prior to this book but now she isn’t going to be able to draw from that knowledge base. After that book on the French Revolution her writing gets more and more conspiratorial…she dips her toe in the sp...
Post a Comment
Read more

Engagement: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 137-139

 There is never a dialogue in which people like Webster attempt to understand the people that they vilify. She has no recognition of the principles that she is fighting against beyond the stereotypes of them. This is why reading this chapter becomes so difficult. Webster name drops all of these proto-socialist thinkers, calls them tools of the Illuminati, but she never explains what the ideology that they are professing is doing to harm society. We are missing the point where she explains what is so dangerous about these movements. In cases where she does say so and so did a bad thing—it’s difficult to say that it was because they were proto-socialists rather that they were like Robespierre and were Tyrants using their ideologies as an excuse to draw more power to themselves. Our enemy in today’s section is trade unionism. She calls this a “ new and mysterious power,” which is an odd take considering the origin of the Freemasons was as originally as a trade union. The problem in W...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Danger? The Plot Against Civilivation pp. 128-136

 We continue on with Webster’s diatribe that Socialism was started by the Illuminati in France before the revolution…or something like that, I’m a little confused as to what her point is. Chronologically, if we just stick to what she has told us, socialism comes after Weishaupt (who never made it to France) and has seeds in Revolutionary France. It doesn’t get going until much later, but nevertheless, this is her story. What’s missing from the story is why Socialism is bad. I consider myself, philosophically, to be very sympathetic to socialism. If the economic positions of Socialism were implemented it would only benefit me, i.e. not having to pay for healthcare would be an extreme boon to my life. This blog is not a place where I extol the virtues of Socialism, if people want to have that debate—there is a very unused comment section below. With that being said, we know that Webster is against Socialism, but we don’t know why. She’s never really made the argument. The only concre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gish Gallop: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 118-128

Webster continues trying to lay the intellectual foundation of the world revolution (which she opposes) with Comte de Simon. Simon, Webster claims, was born with an unbalanced brain inherited from his mother; but I do not see confirmation of this fact in any source I quickly checked. She then claims Simon “ had early thrown himself into the wildest excesses and led the life of ‘an adventurer in quest of gold and glory’ but after a while, weary of orgies, he had turned his attention to the regeneration of the world…” I don’t know about the orgies, but I did find her source, “ La Monarchie de Julliet ;” and while my French is pretty bad what isn’t bad is my ability to search through a PDF. I can find no mention of Saint-Simon apart from the ideology that bears his name. Again, her ability to cite cannot be this bad accidentally. Simon did go on a bit of an adventure when he served with the artillery corps in the American revolution where he held the rank of Captain. This is something tha...
Post a Comment
Read more