Conspiracy Theories, Skepticism, and Critical Thinking

I’m trying to figure out who the villain is in our story. Of course it’s the Illuminati, but it’s also the Socialists. It’s anyone that that challenges the status quo. So what’s interesting about the Revolution of 1830 is that this was a revolution against the new status quo put in place by the Illuminati after the only free period of Europe: that which took place during the reign of Napolean. So the Bourgeoise monarchy comes into power and like all monarchies it becomes one that ignores the plight of the people and serves only itself. Which, ok, that’s just how monarchies go—it’s how the one prior to 1789 went that Webster claimed was “for” the people. So then in 1848, the next revolution begins but Webster is claiming, again, that this was organized “ by the Secret Societies, directed by the Socialists, executed by the working-men and aggravated by the intractable attitude of the King and his ministers, the second great outbreak of World Revolution took place. ” She admits that there...

 The Russian revolution figures heavily into conspiracy lore because it also settles into the fear of conservatives over Communism. The John Birch Society likely never exists if the omnipresent boogeymen of Communism doesn’t scare their members into donating. We’re obviously before that time, WWII hasn’t happened yet, and Webster is writing pretty recently after the formation of the USSR under Josef Stalin. The problem that conspiracy theorists have in covering the Russian Revolution is the same problem that they have in covering the French Revolution: they have to pretend that everything was fine before the revolution. What’s going to be interesting about this chapter is that Webster is stepping outside of her comfort zone. She’s written a historical book about the French Revolution prior to this book but now she isn’t going to be able to draw from that knowledge base. After that book on the French Revolution her writing gets more and more conspiratorial…she dips her toe in the sp...

 There is never a dialogue in which people like Webster attempt to understand the people that they vilify. She has no recognition of the principles that she is fighting against beyond the stereotypes of them. This is why reading this chapter becomes so difficult. Webster name drops all of these proto-socialist thinkers, calls them tools of the Illuminati, but she never explains what the ideology that they are professing is doing to harm society. We are missing the point where she explains what is so dangerous about these movements. In cases where she does say so and so did a bad thing—it’s difficult to say that it was because they were proto-socialists rather that they were like Robespierre and were Tyrants using their ideologies as an excuse to draw more power to themselves. Our enemy in today’s section is trade unionism. She calls this a “ new and mysterious power,” which is an odd take considering the origin of the Freemasons was as originally as a trade union. The problem in W...