Interlude

 No post this week. It's the end of the semester and I must focus on grading. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Environmentalism: Behold a Pale Horse pp. 215-216

A common trait amongst conspiracy theorists is that they like to brag that they know everything. They've seen the "TRUTH" and this sight has given them perfect knowledge. It does not matter that the knowledge they have will also run counter to other conspiracy theorists, requires a whole new reality, or is just plain bonkers. Conspiracy theorists have this trait of speaking with authority on every subject that comes across their mind.  Cooper, we may remember, was in the Navy and possibly the Air Force. He took some classes in radio but in every other respect, he's just a regular guy. Cooper gets a lot of credit from the UFOlogy circuit and the conspiracy crowd because he worked in Naval Intelligence, but to us--that means nothing. He claims an expertise in everything--but as we're about to see: he has very little understanding of the natural world especially.  In a symposium held in 1957...possibly the Bilderberg meeting that he alluded to last time, the JASON so...
Read more

Air: We Never Went to the Moon pp. 36-55

 One of the most annoying things about this book is that it’s divided into chapters that are too short for a single post but too long to do two at a time. This chapter is a bit different because it becomes photo heavy. “ Here is shown that NASA has created the evidence for their conviction.” Sentences like this drive me nuts, when my students try this kind of bullshit, I hit it with the red underline and a comment saying, “don’t do this.” There’s a much easier way to say this, “I will show evidence NASA faked the landing.” It’s much clearer. Instead, Kaysing tries to get profound and fails. The content of the words makes something profound not simply the construction. If you’re familiar with this conspiracy theory, then you are going to be familiar with what follows: “ The photographs presented here are in 4 groups showing the major areas of discrepancy. ” The shortness of this chapter makes sense because it’s not important what Kaysing is saying…not really. What matters is that he...
Read more

Origin Story: We Never Went to the Moon pp. 10-12

  Kaysing begins, as all conspiracy theory books do, with how he arrived at the knowledge of the conspiracy. Kaysing worked for seven years at Rocketdyne, “ the firm that built the main propulsion units for Apollo …” Let’s be clear that Kaysing is trying to pull a fast one on the reader already. He’s not claiming that he worked on the propulsion engines, he’s just saying that he worked at the company which made them. He’s curiously leaving out what his position was at Rocketdyne. If he worked on the boosters that would be front and center. This is very similar to the infamous Area 51 “whistleblower” but actual liar, Bob Lazar. Lazar claimed that he worked at Los Alamos but then leaves it at that. In reality, he worked for a company that developed film for the government at Los Alamos. We are meant to think he did something important at Alamos because that’s where “the Bomb” was made. I’m sure that film development is an important part of whatever was going on there, but that’s not ...
Read more