The Internationale Jewe: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 174-177

We shift locations from France to the German states in 1848. Going concurrent with the French revolution apparently. A little context, Germany is not one country. Much like Italy in the Renaissance period it’s a series of republics, principalities, and theocracies with ill-defined borders and a shared language. The strongest of these is Prussia which has a Spartan like devotion to military prowess and has, at its head, the one known as Frederick the Great. We met Frederick earlier in this book, and Webster is not a fan.

She’s not a fan, because she hates Germans. I mentioned this in the beginning of this series: the only thing that kept her from becoming an English Nazi is that she hated Germans too much. She was anti-Semitic and as we have seen, a fascist—but aligning herself with the German people was a step too far. It’s a weirdly focused racism that keeps one from becoming a Nazi but here we are.

Conspiratorially we’ve met Germany when we dealt with Robison’s book. His problem there was that the Illuminati was German, but that didn’t last long. His other problem was that there existed a group of people attempting to create a society that promoted literacy amongst the German people. This was bad for reasons he never explained.

In 1848 Frederick William III apparently made some deal with the Masons to unite Germany, or something. It’s hard to tell because Webster was against Frederick’s plan, his son, and his son’s son’s plan to unite Germany. Yet, none of this is necessary for a plot against civilization. What Webster wants us to believe is that during the 1840s/1850s; as the revolutionary fervor sweeps through Europe against totalitarian monarchy; the Masons/Illuminati/whoever are behind it; and we are supposed to be against these revolutions. However, as before, she doesn’t make the case why we should be against it aside from the fact that they can’t immediately deliver on their promises.

William IV she calls subversive, because he refuses the “crown of shame.” She never explains the situation. The implication Webster provides is that a secret power was at work to convince William IV to refuse the crown. That power—The Jews.

That’s right, our sons of Abraham are back. It’s been an entire chapter since she’s blamed a revolution (or anything) on the Jews. She’s explained when a character in her story is Jewish and that sort of counts; but here she’s blaming Frederick IV’s actions on them.

Alright let’s back up a second. The real reason that Freddy IV refused the crown is because accepting the title of King of the Germans would have meant that Austria would form its own constitution and be a seperate state. This was not desirable to Freddy IV because he, and subsequent German rulers, tend to believe that Austria is a German state. Why? Because they speak German. This is the Machiavellian position (an actual Machiavellian position not the caricature that most people think of)— people with a common language and history should be members of one nation. Fred isn’t taking the crown because he wants Austria as a German state, which is not the deal that the German assembly can make.

Webster thinks its the Jews. This makes less sense than her usual anti-Semitic conspiracy theorizing. She keeps calling the Masonic plan to push for a united German people as “Subversive” but what is it subverting? She must really be in favor of disparate German states and many different crowns in charge. If the Masonic plan is subversive and the Frederick unwilling to go along that must mean that the Jewish plan is against the Illuminati/Masonic plan.

Who the hell is in charge of the European plan? Even she’s unclear: “we have seen them insinuating themselves into Masonic lodges and secret societies, we have seen rich Jews financing the Haute Vente Romaine, and needy members of the tribe acting as agents of Nubius, but at the same time we have watched the building up of Capitalism by Jewish hands, and Jews in Russia supporting the authority of the Czar.”

They do everything. Socialism? Jewish plot. Capitalism? Jewish plot. Anarchism? Jewish plot. Totalitarianism? Jewish plot. They fund not only the revolution but also the counter-revolution. So…to what end?

Even she asks this question, “how are we to explain this double role of the jews throughout the social revolution?”

Which she then answers, “the common theory that as victims of oppression they embraced with fervor the doctrine of ‘Liberty and Equality’ formulated by the lodges is completely refuted by Disraeli in an illuminating passage:”

The passage comes from a book about Lord George Bentinck by Benjamin Disraeli. The passage is completely irrelevant because its answering a question that no one asked. The actual question is the one that Webster asked: what are they doing in the double role? The answer is not: as victims of oppression, they embraced the masonic slogan. I don’t know what the answer is, because it’s not a real question. It’s an implication. Further, the passage doesn’t answer the secondary question. We’re going to dive headfirst into Webster’s anti-Semitism.