The Anarchist European Tour 1878: The Plot Against Civilization pp. 247-249
We’re done with Russia, so no more of that weird racism—we’ll just have to settle for Webster’s normal brand. It’s 1878 and she claims that “Western Europe experienced a repercussion of the Russian Terror, and the four leading Anarchists, Kropotkine, Cafiero, Malatesta, and Brousse, organized a worldwide scheme of violence described by them as the ‘Propaganda of the Deed.”
I don’t think she knows what ‘repercussion’ means. Does she
mean to say that the scheme of the four is in direct response to the Russian
Tsar’s clamp down of the Russian citizens? I am really asking that question
because there is no context for her claim. It’s the first sentence of the
paragraph that opens the section.
We just have to move past it I guess.
The end of the paragraph implies a good old fashioned false
flag. The German Emperor Wilhelm I (which Webster writes as “William” for what
I assume are racist reasons) was the target of two assassination attempts by
anarchists Hodel and Nobling. Webster tells us that none of the Socialist
writers would claim a link between their organizations to the assassins. They
would, of course, deny this even if there was a link which is where I was
expecting Webster to go. Instead, she just mentions that if we want to believe them,
we can…which is weird for her. Then she writes, “(the would be assassins) served
as a pretext for the anti-Socialist law which Bismark passed triumphantly at
the end of the year.”
Bismark passes these laws which prohibited meetings of
Socialists, Communists, and any organization of Germans that sought to
overthrow the German government. Webster tells us that Hodel (the second
attempted assassin) was found with pictures of two leading Socialists which
would seem to indicate that Hodel at least knew of them. Instead of saying that
the Socialists were lying Webster writes that the pictures may have been, “placed
in his pockets by the Berlin police –may have been hired for the deed, -- agents
provocateurs are, of course, a favorite resource of autocratic governments.”
Here is where the racism gets in the way of a conspiracy
theory. For Webster’s story to be coherent the Socialist organizations of
Germany attempted to assassinate the Emperor in order to further their world
domination plot. This is what she claimed happened in Russia. Instead, she
hates Germans so much that it forces her to claim that maybe the Socialists
aren’t responsible for all the world’s evils and instead it’s those dastardly
Germans. The obvious conspiracy theory takes a strange backseat.
Her anti-German hate continues, “The ‘genius’ of the
German people is naturally disinclined to Individualism, and whether in the
form of Prussian militarism or of State Socialism always favours mass
formation.”
The German is unable to think for themselves and is in fact
unwilling to do so. Unlike Webster who is one hundred percent original and not
parroting strange racial stereotypes and conspiracy theories from the 18th
century.
She then gets a little Tucker Carlson by claiming an actual
unique conspiracy theory. Socialism and Anarchism fail to take hold in Germany
because of those laws. In the real world this isn’t true. Worker solidarity
actually grows in Germany despite the laws but we will set that aside. Instead,
the German government begins exporting their Socialists and Anarchists to the
United Kingdom and the Americas. This is done with the goal of destabilizing
those countries with worker revolts while Germany itself remains clean…which
again, it doesn’t. The worker movements in Germany at this time are strong
enough that Bismark gives them concessions in order to placate them.
In England, especially in London, there is no native
anarchism it’s all German. London is the center of German-anarchism but the
English working class has never took to these ideas. She engages in a repeated
purposeful flip flopping between referring to Anarchists and Socialists. She
claims that Anarchism never found a foothold in England, ok, I’m going to take
her word for that. Socialism did. What she’s trying to accomplish is to confuse
the reader on these two issues so that when we read that even Kropotkine could
find no socialist groups to commiserate with we don’t question it. However we
should remember that these two groups are no the same because she kept
reminding us that her boyfriend was getting tossed out of Socialist groups.
She’s lost focus entirely. We’ve gone from Germany to the UK
and found that there are no anarchists. Ok, so what? Does this mean that the
plot to overthrow civilization, the focus of this book, has stopped? No, of
course not, because we still have 97 pages left in this book.
She hates Socialism and Anarchism, but her reasoning is
never explained. I know plenty of people that disagree with Socialism but they
have reasons. We’ve just been told that Socialism is part of the plot but are
never given a reason how or why? In contemporary conspiracy theories the plot
is a little more detailed but it still lacks this one aspect. Socialism
requires organization and pamphlets, if I was going to try and subvert civilization,
I would merely use the existing system. It’s much more efficient than doing all
of this agitation.
We remember that the Internationale is dead, the largest
worker’s organization in European history (to that point) failed when it
realized that it was much better to have localized organizations that could
adapt to the needs of the locals. Webster, in desperate need of a villain,
claims that a “formidable sect’ springing to life again – the original
Illuminati of Weishaupt.” Dun dun duuunnnnnn!
Comments
Post a Comment